<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-end-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-end-times/</link>
	<description>Proclaiming My Mind For Him</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:18:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: roberto127</title>
		<link>http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-end-times/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>roberto127</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I very much see where you&#039;re coming from. I didn&#039;t have much time to write this post, so missed alot of things where I wanted to explain more in depth. The beast I was referring to was indeed the Antichrist, but inserted it to make it known. Looking back at it, I see that I should have used more scripture to clarify my point rather than insert stuff and expect people to acknowledge it as biblical. As for everything else, I will try to go more in depth with what I wrote on this post and try to cover clarify it with scripture rather than what I hear, only on a later date because I am still very much occupied with so many other things. I may write a few different posts in the meantime, but I&#039;ve already made that committment to answer completely and not slap a bunch of verses together and be done with it. And indeed, I must &quot;Let scripture interpret scripture&quot; Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much see where you&#8217;re coming from. I didn&#8217;t have much time to write this post, so missed alot of things where I wanted to explain more in depth. The beast I was referring to was indeed the Antichrist, but inserted it to make it known. Looking back at it, I see that I should have used more scripture to clarify my point rather than insert stuff and expect people to acknowledge it as biblical. As for everything else, I will try to go more in depth with what I wrote on this post and try to cover clarify it with scripture rather than what I hear, only on a later date because I am still very much occupied with so many other things. I may write a few different posts in the meantime, but I&#8217;ve already made that committment to answer completely and not slap a bunch of verses together and be done with it. And indeed, I must &#8220;Let scripture interpret scripture&#8221; Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-end-times/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunsunghero.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-158</guid>
		<description>YOU SAID, &quot;The week translates into 7 years. I myself am not completely sure as to why...&quot; WHAT? &quot;...but it does make logical sense.&quot; Wait a minute? How can you not be sure as to why and then say it makes logical sense? That doesn&#039;t make logical sense!

YOU SAID, &quot;Revelations 13:5 ‘ The beast [antichrist...&quot;  Hold on there. Did you just insert the word [antischrist] where John didn&#039;t even do that? WOW. Why are you inserting into God&#039;s word?

If John had no problem using the word &quot;antichrist&quot; in the previous book 1 John 4:1-3, then why wouldn&#039;t he use the term &quot;antichrist&quot; in Revelation? 

Also, John had no problem with using the number 7 to describe the 7 stars, 7 churches, 7 lampstands etc., in Revelation, why not use 7 to describe this mythical 7-year tribulation?

Study to show thyself approved and not what others tell you. Let scripture interpret scripture. It&#039;s good for the kingdom.

God Bless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU SAID, &#8220;The week translates into 7 years. I myself am not completely sure as to why&#8230;&#8221; WHAT? &#8220;&#8230;but it does make logical sense.&#8221; Wait a minute? How can you not be sure as to why and then say it makes logical sense? That doesn&#8217;t make logical sense!</p>
<p>YOU SAID, &#8220;Revelations 13:5 ‘ The beast [antichrist..."  Hold on there. Did you just insert the word [antischrist] where John didn&#8217;t even do that? WOW. Why are you inserting into God&#8217;s word?</p>
<p>If John had no problem using the word &#8220;antichrist&#8221; in the previous book 1 John 4:1-3, then why wouldn&#8217;t he use the term &#8220;antichrist&#8221; in Revelation? </p>
<p>Also, John had no problem with using the number 7 to describe the 7 stars, 7 churches, 7 lampstands etc., in Revelation, why not use 7 to describe this mythical 7-year tribulation?</p>
<p>Study to show thyself approved and not what others tell you. Let scripture interpret scripture. It&#8217;s good for the kingdom.</p>
<p>God Bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
